SnakeRiverLib

As I was finishing my podcast I had an epiphany of sorts.   I was speaking regarding how Madam Secretary, or I mean Comrad Speaker Pelosi was handling the impeachment of the President.  Actually to call it an impeachment is wrong.  Why? Until they vote to begin an Impeachment Inquiry, and allow Due Process for the President, everyone on the President's side, and that means the President, White House staff, members of Congress, and media that are unbiased, or biased towards Trump, should call this what it is: A POLITICAL LYNCHING!  Strong words?  Yes, and they are intentional.  It is an illegal trial right out of Stalin's play book, and of not that, then the Klan's.  They are subpoenaing witnesses, bringing them in to testify behind closed doors.  They then piece together a testimony that fits their narrative, and release it to their PR firm the press.   The idea of a "whistle blower" is ridiculous on its face.  This person who didn't hear the phone c

Okay, so I couldn't wait to talk about impeachment.  Sue me.  It is timely, and while completely bogus, there is some strategy to it. First, a lesson on impeachment.  Impeachment is a tool built in to the Constitution for removing members of the Executive and Judicial Branches of government.  It is the Legislature's check on them.  You know that whole check and balance thing, between the three branches of the government, not the legislature, #AOC.  This is important to remember, because when you hear members of Congress whining about Judges being partisan or whatever, they actually could do something about it.  They won't, but they could.  It starts in the House of Representatives.  They vote on Articles of Impeachment.  Now, what reaches the level of impeachment is not clearly defined, the only definition being "High Crimes and Misdemeanors".  After all, President Clinton was impeached for lying under oath, a felony.  The only other president impeached was An