Comrad Pelosi's show trial, and what it means for you.
As I was finishing my podcast I had an epiphany of sorts.
I was speaking regarding how Madam Secretary, or I mean Comrad Speaker Pelosi was handling the impeachment of the President. Actually to call it an impeachment is wrong. Why?
Until they vote to begin an Impeachment Inquiry, and allow Due Process for the President, everyone on the President's side, and that means the President, White House staff, members of Congress, and media that are unbiased, or biased towards Trump, should call this what it is:
A POLITICAL LYNCHING! Strong words? Yes, and they are intentional.
It is an illegal trial right out of Stalin's play book, and of not that, then the Klan's. They are subpoenaing witnesses, bringing them in to testify behind closed doors. They then piece together a testimony that fits their narrative, and release it to their PR firm the press.
The idea of a "whistle blower" is ridiculous on its face. This person who didn't hear the phone call, but rather allegedly overheard discussion of it, did not follow procedure. Instead, they went to the Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff-for-Brains (D-CA) and told him. He told them to get a lawyer and what to do. The "whistle blower lied on their form as they didn't mention their running to political hack Schiff. This, by the way, is a crime, and likely negates any whistle blower protection. But that doesn't matter to Schiff. Nor does it matter that this person is a political hack themselves, working for one of the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates. Hmm, wonder if that matters, especially after the DNC had the DOJ spying on the Trump campaign and then the Trump White House, post election. Yeah, that sounds great.
So, what was the epiphany?
The president is being denied his constitutional rights of due process by this being a lynching instead of an impeachment. He cannot confront his accuser. He cannot subpoena witnesses on his behalf. He cannot cross-examine witnesses for the prosecution, INCLUDING the "WHISTLE BLOWER!" All he can do is sit and wait.
Is it any wonder that he is instructing Executive Branch personnel to not testify? Nor would I. He is demanding his Constitutional rights. And well he should. He is doing it on our behalf. Why?
If they are willing to deny the President his constitutional rights in the light of day, in front of the world, what are they willing to do to you? While these things have been done to various groups in years past, Now no one will be immune. The government will no longer be the guarantor of rights, it will the denier of same. It will be universal, well, unless you qualify under some scheme of intersectional mathematics.
Don't think they will? They hate you. They hate me. If you supported Trump by voting for him they hate you too. "It is YOUR fault that Lady Macbeth is not ruling now." :You are deplorable, despicable". :You are a dirty gun clinger." "How dare you support the President and his constitutional rights!" "You are the problem". "Don't you understand?" "Of course you don't." "You are too fill in the blank -ist, or -obic to understand." Didn't LeBron James just say something very similar to that? oops, wrong topic.
Today it is the President. If they win in 2020, it will be all who do not conform.
I was speaking regarding how Madam Secretary, or I mean Comrad Speaker Pelosi was handling the impeachment of the President. Actually to call it an impeachment is wrong. Why?
Until they vote to begin an Impeachment Inquiry, and allow Due Process for the President, everyone on the President's side, and that means the President, White House staff, members of Congress, and media that are unbiased, or biased towards Trump, should call this what it is:
A POLITICAL LYNCHING! Strong words? Yes, and they are intentional.
It is an illegal trial right out of Stalin's play book, and of not that, then the Klan's. They are subpoenaing witnesses, bringing them in to testify behind closed doors. They then piece together a testimony that fits their narrative, and release it to their PR firm the press.
The idea of a "whistle blower" is ridiculous on its face. This person who didn't hear the phone call, but rather allegedly overheard discussion of it, did not follow procedure. Instead, they went to the Intelligence Committee Chair Adam Schiff-for-Brains (D-CA) and told him. He told them to get a lawyer and what to do. The "whistle blower lied on their form as they didn't mention their running to political hack Schiff. This, by the way, is a crime, and likely negates any whistle blower protection. But that doesn't matter to Schiff. Nor does it matter that this person is a political hack themselves, working for one of the 2020 Democratic presidential candidates. Hmm, wonder if that matters, especially after the DNC had the DOJ spying on the Trump campaign and then the Trump White House, post election. Yeah, that sounds great.
So, what was the epiphany?
The president is being denied his constitutional rights of due process by this being a lynching instead of an impeachment. He cannot confront his accuser. He cannot subpoena witnesses on his behalf. He cannot cross-examine witnesses for the prosecution, INCLUDING the "WHISTLE BLOWER!" All he can do is sit and wait.
Is it any wonder that he is instructing Executive Branch personnel to not testify? Nor would I. He is demanding his Constitutional rights. And well he should. He is doing it on our behalf. Why?
If they are willing to deny the President his constitutional rights in the light of day, in front of the world, what are they willing to do to you? While these things have been done to various groups in years past, Now no one will be immune. The government will no longer be the guarantor of rights, it will the denier of same. It will be universal, well, unless you qualify under some scheme of intersectional mathematics.
Don't think they will? They hate you. They hate me. If you supported Trump by voting for him they hate you too. "It is YOUR fault that Lady Macbeth is not ruling now." :You are deplorable, despicable". :You are a dirty gun clinger." "How dare you support the President and his constitutional rights!" "You are the problem". "Don't you understand?" "Of course you don't." "You are too fill in the blank -ist, or -obic to understand." Didn't LeBron James just say something very similar to that? oops, wrong topic.
Today it is the President. If they win in 2020, it will be all who do not conform.
Comments
Post a Comment