SnakeRiverLib

This one will be short, or that is my intent. Right now, having heard oral arguments for the case regarding the Citizenship question on the 2020 US Census.  If this case is anything other than 9-0, the House and Senate should start impeachment hearings on those Justices that voted against a question on Citizenship.  It very likely won't be, unfortunately.  What is all the commotion? In briefs before the Supremes, the arguments being made are laughable, and make a mockery of our judicial process.  They argue: That illegals (their argument was undocumented but they are here illegally) won't fill out the Census because they will be hunted down and deported.  This argument was made by the California AG, as well as some county in Texas, whose population of illegals merits a Congressional seat on its own (they actually argued that) The House's brief, filed by the Speaker's office actually insinuated that illegals will be breaking the law by not filling out the Census,

While there is no question that the 22nd Amendment was written so that we would never have another as near King as we had with FDR, it was not passed to prevent him from running for a 5th term.  By the time it was considered and sent to the states, FDR was dead.  Of course, that is old history, but it seemed to have been dredged up by AOC, who got it wrong.  Speaking of getting our Constitution wrong... Senator Gillibrand, D-NY, and candidate for the Democrat 2020 presidential nomination, said recently that we need to get back to our roots of "one person, one vote".  Of course she was referring to the Electoral College, and the need to get rid of it.  I mean, it seems to me that the Electoral College was created BY the Founders as part of the Constitution.  You see, the Founders understood that leaving the choice of the President to the majority would leave the government at risk of being hijacked by that majority, leaving the minority to be trampled upon.  Hmm, sounds like