The 2020 DNC Primary is on!
First, a word.
I would not attack members of Congress, or any politician because of religion, race, or other individual personal characteristic, for two reasons. One, I couldn't care less what their status is, so long as they understand they swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution. Second, people whose argument is so weak they have to hide behind their victimhood and imagined attacks on it, have no business in Congress. But, as others throw the race, gender, or other card, I guess that is to be expected. When the Democrats can't pass a resolution condemning Rep. Omar (D-MN) for her slurs of Israel, which is how it began, by the time it was modified, Rep. Omar (the person that was to be admonished with this resolution) ended up voting for some watered down version condemning hate, or something.
But. When one previously worked for Hamas, like Omar, (their US PR firm, CAIR and is still raising money for them), we need to be very careful about their motives. More than likely they DO have allegiances other than the US.
You may say,"yeah, why do you tolerate Trump, but constantly criticized Obama you fill in the blank -ist or -phobe" I knew Trump was no conservative, you can read about it in past posts in the Lib back during the campaign. What I had hoped was that he would be such a wrecking ball to the Swamp, or Deep State, or Leviathan, that it would drive change. He is reducing regulation, but it isn't fast enough, and deep enough. Besides, reducing regulations, cutting taxes, and awesome judges? Yeah, that too.
Now on to the Main event. Granted, there are others, and if they start to gain traction, we will bring them in and score them accordingly.
We now introduce the 2020 Intersectional Sweepstakes, also known as the 2020 DNC Primary. Here we add up points based on their victimhood, and degree of progressivity, and predict the nominee. Leaders for each round in red.
First, Gender. 2 points for female, 1 point for male, and 10 points for other.
Harris (CA) 2
Warren (MA) 2
Gillibrand (NY) 2
Klobuchar (MN) 2
Booker (NJ) 1
Sanders (I-VT) 1
Biden? 1
Robert O'Rourke? 1(couldn't beat Ted Cruz in Texas with 50,000 or more illegals voting for him)
So far, we have a four way tie. BTW, I included Joe Biden former VP and Senator of Delaware as he is right now taking the temperature of the race.
What next? Race. Other than White 2, White 1, and White after claiming some minority status -2
Harris 2 cumulative 4
Warren -2 cumulative 0
Gillibrand 1 cumulative 3
Klobuchar 1 cumulative 3
Booker 2 cumulative 3
Sanders 1 cumulative 2
Biden 1 cumulative 2
O'Rourke -2 cumulative -1 (white pretending to be Hispanic with his "Beto' nickname.
That did sort some out. Now leading the way is Harris, followed by Gillibrand and Klobuchar.
Support of the Green New Deal. Yes 1, No 0, Testing the wind -5
Harris 1, 5
Warren 1, 1
Gillibrand --5, -2
Klobuchar 0, 3
Booker 1 4
Sanders 1 3
Biden 0 2
O'Rourke 1, 0
Not sure of sexual preference, and so we can't judge that one. That may be the only way those at the back of the pack would be able to catch up. That or a gender identification change.
As the race starts to get going, no doubt we will have other categories to add and subtract points. An example would be whether Amy Klobuchar was really abusive to her staff, or whether or not Gillibrand was a #metoo facilitator by members of her staff.
For now, it is Harris in the lead, with Spartacus close behind.
Of course, all of this is based on today. And it is going to lead to a Trump victory. The country is tipping, admittedly to demanding a socialist hell, but we aren't quite there yet. When Klobuchar and Biden are not really in the running because they refuse to go wacko left, is telling about the party misreading the tea leaves. If the party does wake up, maybe due to one of these far lefty freshman Congresswomen going too far, then perhaps Biden gets a shot. Which, again, today, would be the only one being talked about that could beat Trump.
In the meantime, Speaker Pelosi is barely hanging on to her gavel as her caucus is being torn apart. Old vs. New members. The new members think they run the place, and based on the "hate" resolution, very well may.
I would not attack members of Congress, or any politician because of religion, race, or other individual personal characteristic, for two reasons. One, I couldn't care less what their status is, so long as they understand they swore an oath to uphold the U.S. Constitution. Second, people whose argument is so weak they have to hide behind their victimhood and imagined attacks on it, have no business in Congress. But, as others throw the race, gender, or other card, I guess that is to be expected. When the Democrats can't pass a resolution condemning Rep. Omar (D-MN) for her slurs of Israel, which is how it began, by the time it was modified, Rep. Omar (the person that was to be admonished with this resolution) ended up voting for some watered down version condemning hate, or something.
But. When one previously worked for Hamas, like Omar, (their US PR firm, CAIR and is still raising money for them), we need to be very careful about their motives. More than likely they DO have allegiances other than the US.
You may say,"yeah, why do you tolerate Trump, but constantly criticized Obama you fill in the blank -ist or -phobe" I knew Trump was no conservative, you can read about it in past posts in the Lib back during the campaign. What I had hoped was that he would be such a wrecking ball to the Swamp, or Deep State, or Leviathan, that it would drive change. He is reducing regulation, but it isn't fast enough, and deep enough. Besides, reducing regulations, cutting taxes, and awesome judges? Yeah, that too.
Now on to the Main event. Granted, there are others, and if they start to gain traction, we will bring them in and score them accordingly.
We now introduce the 2020 Intersectional Sweepstakes, also known as the 2020 DNC Primary. Here we add up points based on their victimhood, and degree of progressivity, and predict the nominee. Leaders for each round in red.
First, Gender. 2 points for female, 1 point for male, and 10 points for other.
Harris (CA) 2
Warren (MA) 2
Gillibrand (NY) 2
Klobuchar (MN) 2
Booker (NJ) 1
Sanders (I-VT) 1
Biden? 1
Robert O'Rourke? 1(couldn't beat Ted Cruz in Texas with 50,000 or more illegals voting for him)
So far, we have a four way tie. BTW, I included Joe Biden former VP and Senator of Delaware as he is right now taking the temperature of the race.
What next? Race. Other than White 2, White 1, and White after claiming some minority status -2
Harris 2 cumulative 4
Warren -2 cumulative 0
Gillibrand 1 cumulative 3
Klobuchar 1 cumulative 3
Booker 2 cumulative 3
Sanders 1 cumulative 2
Biden 1 cumulative 2
O'Rourke -2 cumulative -1 (white pretending to be Hispanic with his "Beto' nickname.
That did sort some out. Now leading the way is Harris, followed by Gillibrand and Klobuchar.
Support of the Green New Deal. Yes 1, No 0, Testing the wind -5
Harris 1, 5
Warren 1, 1
Gillibrand --5, -2
Klobuchar 0, 3
Booker 1 4
Sanders 1 3
Biden 0 2
O'Rourke 1, 0
Not sure of sexual preference, and so we can't judge that one. That may be the only way those at the back of the pack would be able to catch up. That or a gender identification change.
As the race starts to get going, no doubt we will have other categories to add and subtract points. An example would be whether Amy Klobuchar was really abusive to her staff, or whether or not Gillibrand was a #metoo facilitator by members of her staff.
For now, it is Harris in the lead, with Spartacus close behind.
Of course, all of this is based on today. And it is going to lead to a Trump victory. The country is tipping, admittedly to demanding a socialist hell, but we aren't quite there yet. When Klobuchar and Biden are not really in the running because they refuse to go wacko left, is telling about the party misreading the tea leaves. If the party does wake up, maybe due to one of these far lefty freshman Congresswomen going too far, then perhaps Biden gets a shot. Which, again, today, would be the only one being talked about that could beat Trump.
In the meantime, Speaker Pelosi is barely hanging on to her gavel as her caucus is being torn apart. Old vs. New members. The new members think they run the place, and based on the "hate" resolution, very well may.
Comments
Post a Comment