Seven. Not a movie

Today, the Republicans did the right thing, and put things back to pre-2003.  Prior to 2003, judges were not filibustered.  The only one that came close was Abe Fortas back in the 60s, and it was to be a bipartisan filibuster, due to ethical issues.  The fact that Ruth Bader Ginsburg got on the Court with a 96-3 vote speaks to the willingness of Republicans to allow a nominee that was well qualified, even though she was about as hard left as is possible, while still pretending to be "unbiased"

Which brings us to 2003.  What is special about that year?  Republicans held a narrow lead in the Senate, W was president.  In 2001, W nominated Miguel Estrada to the DC Circuit.  So for nearly two years, Democrats sat on the nomination.  Miguel Estrada was a brilliant immigrant from Honduras, ( I thought Dems loved immigrants, oh, wait, he was legal, never mind).  He had served as a US Attorney, and as the Associate Solicitor General under Bush 41.  So, now, with a majority, Republicans, stupidly, thought they could just bring him up for a vote, and that while it would probably be party line, would be confirmed.

WRONG!  Enter the filibuster. Who was in the minority again?  Oh yeah, Democrats.  Now why would they filibuster a wise Latino? (to paraphrase the now first Latina on the Supreme Court)  it wasn't even the Supreme Court!  It is because they knew he would likely be W's choice for the Supreme Court, if a vacancy occurred.  And they knew that if they allowed a vote to the DC Circuit, and he was confirmed, they couldn't have stopped him from getting on the Supreme Court.  AAANNNDDD, they would have been on record voting against a Latino, either for the DC Circuit, or the Supreme.

Cloture Vote  Rejected

Cloture Vote  Rejected

Cloture Vote  Rejected

Cloture Vote  Rejected

Cloture Vote  Rejected

Cloture Vote  Rejected.

Cloture Vote  Rejected.

He withdrew his name from consideration.  The toll the process had on him personally was horrible.  His wife miscarried during the process, and overdosed on alcohol and sleeping pills in 2004.

So now, as then, a clear majority supports the nominee.  If only Bill Frist R-TN, (the majority leader at the time) had done this back then....

It would be nice to go back to the question of qualification, rather than politics.  Won't happen.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Civil Marriage: An Institution whose time has past?

Rand showed the way for small business. Is it time to act?

The Brownback Effect, and why Donald Trump and those associated with cannot win in 2024.