The last before the election.
First, predictions.
Regardless of the FBI rolling on their responsibilities, I still think that Trump will win.
It is not to say that I will be surprised if Hillary wins. I won't be.
So, if Madam Secretary wins.
Contrary to the members of the House, who have promised endless impeachment hearings, I think all that needs to be done with. The current President could facilitate this by granting a blanket pardon for anything that Hillary has done. There is too much division right now, and the House trying to re-prosecute the election will only hurt their already bad image. Let it go. The people know she is dirty. They know she can't be trusted. If they elect her, then they are okay with it. It would be better to focus on policy. I know how hard that will be, but if you can't make your case, then get the heck out. Period.
The rest depends on control of the Senate. If the Dems control, they will go nuclear on the filibuster to get some other Marxist on the Supreme Court.
Otherwise, gridlock. She is a lousy orator, no one likes her, (and that includes the media, they just hate Trump worse.) Unlike the current President, she doesn't have any credits in her bank. Again, make the case, and let the chips fall where they will. I have even heard some opine that the media will turn on her after the election, bringing Kaine in as Pres. that is a tinfoil to far for me. Right now.
Article V. Article V. Article V. Look it up
http://www.conventionofstates.com/
If Trump wins.
Promise to pardon Clinton, same as above, allowing her to go off into the sunset, with some dignity. Plus, the distraction of defeating her again is not necessary. I also suspect that if Trump lives up to what he has campaigned on, the House will be too busy to deal with something that is meaningless.
I presume that if Trump wins, that the Senate is GOP. I would rather allow the Supremes go down to 7, but that would need a lib judge to retire. Otherwise, appoint someone to the right of Scalia, and have the Senate nuke the filibuster to get them through (Andrew Napolitano, anyone?)
You know what is applicable to both?
Article V. Article V, Article V So yes, regardless.
What could have been. Horrible GOP candidate, Horrible Dem candidate, If ever there was an opportunity for a Libertarian to make a difference, this would have been it. By the way, Governor, being libertarian does not mean government forcing individuals to not discriminate. FYI. Also, 270 was never in the cards, so focusing on states that you could win, would have been better. Yes, you were screwed by the media. But you should have known that going in as well. NM, UT, CO, NV, were all reachable, forcing the election to the House.
Did I mention Article V?
Regardless of the FBI rolling on their responsibilities, I still think that Trump will win.
It is not to say that I will be surprised if Hillary wins. I won't be.
So, if Madam Secretary wins.
Contrary to the members of the House, who have promised endless impeachment hearings, I think all that needs to be done with. The current President could facilitate this by granting a blanket pardon for anything that Hillary has done. There is too much division right now, and the House trying to re-prosecute the election will only hurt their already bad image. Let it go. The people know she is dirty. They know she can't be trusted. If they elect her, then they are okay with it. It would be better to focus on policy. I know how hard that will be, but if you can't make your case, then get the heck out. Period.
The rest depends on control of the Senate. If the Dems control, they will go nuclear on the filibuster to get some other Marxist on the Supreme Court.
Otherwise, gridlock. She is a lousy orator, no one likes her, (and that includes the media, they just hate Trump worse.) Unlike the current President, she doesn't have any credits in her bank. Again, make the case, and let the chips fall where they will. I have even heard some opine that the media will turn on her after the election, bringing Kaine in as Pres. that is a tinfoil to far for me. Right now.
Article V. Article V. Article V. Look it up
http://www.conventionofstates.com/
If Trump wins.
Promise to pardon Clinton, same as above, allowing her to go off into the sunset, with some dignity. Plus, the distraction of defeating her again is not necessary. I also suspect that if Trump lives up to what he has campaigned on, the House will be too busy to deal with something that is meaningless.
I presume that if Trump wins, that the Senate is GOP. I would rather allow the Supremes go down to 7, but that would need a lib judge to retire. Otherwise, appoint someone to the right of Scalia, and have the Senate nuke the filibuster to get them through (Andrew Napolitano, anyone?)
You know what is applicable to both?
Article V. Article V, Article V So yes, regardless.
What could have been. Horrible GOP candidate, Horrible Dem candidate, If ever there was an opportunity for a Libertarian to make a difference, this would have been it. By the way, Governor, being libertarian does not mean government forcing individuals to not discriminate. FYI. Also, 270 was never in the cards, so focusing on states that you could win, would have been better. Yes, you were screwed by the media. But you should have known that going in as well. NM, UT, CO, NV, were all reachable, forcing the election to the House.
Did I mention Article V?
Trump promised to put her in jail, but I think you may be right. This whole thing is such a mess and so ugly. Now we see Bernie was being blackmailed, and they got Comey to back off again. There will never be justice for those people behind this corruption.
ReplyDelete