They want a Stalin.
If you would like some mood music for the piece, here it is, if you open it in a new tab, you can listen while you read. I wonder if they had any issues in the Soviet Union with athletes kneeling while it played, to protest the disappearances of the 3rd and 4th place Olympic finishers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sxTbfeYdO0
How do you know when a President is a would be tyrant? Or when the media want a president to be a tyrant?
When they demand that illegal and unconstitutional Orders be kept as law.
Oh, and if that wasn't bad enough, Speaker Ryan (R-WI) who argued for years that DACA was UNCONSTITUTIONAL, has called for this unconstitutional action to stand.
As a reminder.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_sxTbfeYdO0
How do you know when a President is a would be tyrant? Or when the media want a president to be a tyrant?
When they demand that illegal and unconstitutional Orders be kept as law.
Oh, and if that wasn't bad enough, Speaker Ryan (R-WI) who argued for years that DACA was UNCONSTITUTIONAL, has called for this unconstitutional action to stand.
As a reminder.
In 2009, President Obama had a FILIBUSTER PROOF MAJORITY in the Senate and a significant majority in the House. What did he do with it?
A piece of crap health care law that was never fully enacted, that despite three years of preparation, and hundreds of billions of dollars to shore up the program, still sucks, and is failing.
A stimulus package that the President himself joked years later, "apparently the jobs were not as shovel ready" as he had stated. So if the stimulus didn't go to infrastructure, where did it go? To shore up local and state government employees, as well as the largest donor to the Democrats, the teachers union. You know, the group, whose President once said that she would care about students when they paid dues. Yeah.
What did he not do? Simple, immigration reform. And why not? Because he couldn't even get a majority of his own party to buy immigration reform. and once he spent every cent and then some of political capital to pass Ocare, and the destruction of the Democrat party as a result, there was no way it would happen legitimately.
How many times did President Obama say he couldn't use an Executive Order to do ANYTHING with immigration? At least 22 separate occasions. He acknowledged that if he were a King, he could have, but that he wasn't, and he was limited by the Constitution. Darn parchment. He then proceeded to take the TYRANT road, and by fiat enacted new law.
President Trump could have rescinded the order on day 1. He didn't. He thought that with a GOP House, and Senate, both of whom were on record as getting rid of Ocare, that they would take care of it. He didn't count on the GOP establishment fighting him.
So why now?
I know that the President could ignore the law, but for too many years and with too many things, that has been done. The main reason things are such a swamp in DC, is you can't step anywhere without stepping on an ignored, or selectively prosecuted law. All Congress needs to do is fix it. Last I remembered, that was their job.
A number of states have brought suits against the Federal Government, regarding DACA. These cases were close to being heard in Court. And even the most progressive legal scholars have said that these Orders, or Actions are unconstitutional. If a ruling were to occur, then there wouldn't be any choice.
I guess when the progressives say they love democracy, what they really mean is that they want what they have in the Democratic Republic of North Korea. Obey or die. Your choice.
Now I get it.
By the way, here are two videos. The first explains how laws should be made, according to the Constitution, the second, the preferred method of progressives and tyrants.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFroMQlKiag&t=35s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUDSeb2zHQ0
parting thought: Trump is being accused of firing Comey because he didn't clear Trump after nearly a year of investigating. And now we find out that Comey was drafting his clearing of Hilary before a single witness was interviewed. just sayin.
What did he not do? Simple, immigration reform. And why not? Because he couldn't even get a majority of his own party to buy immigration reform. and once he spent every cent and then some of political capital to pass Ocare, and the destruction of the Democrat party as a result, there was no way it would happen legitimately.
How many times did President Obama say he couldn't use an Executive Order to do ANYTHING with immigration? At least 22 separate occasions. He acknowledged that if he were a King, he could have, but that he wasn't, and he was limited by the Constitution. Darn parchment. He then proceeded to take the TYRANT road, and by fiat enacted new law.
President Trump could have rescinded the order on day 1. He didn't. He thought that with a GOP House, and Senate, both of whom were on record as getting rid of Ocare, that they would take care of it. He didn't count on the GOP establishment fighting him.
So why now?
I know that the President could ignore the law, but for too many years and with too many things, that has been done. The main reason things are such a swamp in DC, is you can't step anywhere without stepping on an ignored, or selectively prosecuted law. All Congress needs to do is fix it. Last I remembered, that was their job.
A number of states have brought suits against the Federal Government, regarding DACA. These cases were close to being heard in Court. And even the most progressive legal scholars have said that these Orders, or Actions are unconstitutional. If a ruling were to occur, then there wouldn't be any choice.
I guess when the progressives say they love democracy, what they really mean is that they want what they have in the Democratic Republic of North Korea. Obey or die. Your choice.
Now I get it.
By the way, here are two videos. The first explains how laws should be made, according to the Constitution, the second, the preferred method of progressives and tyrants.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFroMQlKiag&t=35s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUDSeb2zHQ0
parting thought: Trump is being accused of firing Comey because he didn't clear Trump after nearly a year of investigating. And now we find out that Comey was drafting his clearing of Hilary before a single witness was interviewed. just sayin.
Comments
Post a Comment