Random thoughts, and quick hits.
I have calmed down since last night, watching the latest Center for Medical Progress' latest video, confirming everything that has come out and more. The more would include the National Institutes for Health buying these body parts and cadavers. Translating, it is your tax money funding abortion, AND buying baby body parts. Remember, the Nazi's doctors excuses were medical research, as they experimented in the concentration camps. The horror uncovered by the Allies liberating these camps moved the world. And yet, people gladly support Planned Parenthood, they rationalize it in their minds, and consciences by saying that PP provides health services, like say... self-sterilizations? Well, that does fit into their genocidal plan.
A great shouting match last night when Megyn Kelley on Fox pointed out the hypocrisy of progressives pointing as a far left wack job, (I know, oxymoron) took shots at Gabby Giffords, former congressman from Arizona. Of course the progressives blamed the tea party, and pointed out the violence that they WISHED the tea party was responsible for. Of course now that we see that the hate group Black Lives Matter is inciting violence against police, all the progressives decrying the anti-government fervor of the tea party now applaud as cops are gunned down, with people chanting "Pigs in a blanket fry them like bacon" Here is the link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNY7PUJ2OYo
If you aren't aware, climate change fascists are combing campuses, demanding to know who is funding the research of those scientists that question the impact of man on climate change, or who point out flaws in the government research. Of course, many are funded by the American Petroleum Institute, or other fossil fuel endeavor. Does that make their research less valid? If so, then let me ask a question. If you feel that money biases research, then what impact does money from the government, which favors a tilt towards man caused climate change, have? If you know that the President is looking for research to prove that climate change exists, then how will you skew your research? Of course to get the answer the money is looking for. It cuts both ways, or neither.
You know, I just had a thought, maybe we could crowdsource a Margaret Sanger Museum, raise money from the supporters of PP, and those who know her history. It could have murals depicting the 10s of millions of babies whose lives were snuffed in her grand scheme. You could show newspaper clippings of her meeting with the Klan., You could put her wonderful quotes on the wall to show how wonderful she was, and how here legacy continues today. You just have to tell people that it is a true tribute to the woman who has done so much to so many. You could mount in front the busts of people that PP has awarded with their highest honor,
As a closing comment. The Center for Medical Progress videos have been accused of being edited and spliced together to get the desired result. It is true they have been edited for time constraint, but the full unedited versions are available on their website, AND have been verified by several non partisan groups, and media, that the edited versions were indeed ONLY edited for time, and not content.
A great shouting match last night when Megyn Kelley on Fox pointed out the hypocrisy of progressives pointing as a far left wack job, (I know, oxymoron) took shots at Gabby Giffords, former congressman from Arizona. Of course the progressives blamed the tea party, and pointed out the violence that they WISHED the tea party was responsible for. Of course now that we see that the hate group Black Lives Matter is inciting violence against police, all the progressives decrying the anti-government fervor of the tea party now applaud as cops are gunned down, with people chanting "Pigs in a blanket fry them like bacon" Here is the link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iNY7PUJ2OYo
If you aren't aware, climate change fascists are combing campuses, demanding to know who is funding the research of those scientists that question the impact of man on climate change, or who point out flaws in the government research. Of course, many are funded by the American Petroleum Institute, or other fossil fuel endeavor. Does that make their research less valid? If so, then let me ask a question. If you feel that money biases research, then what impact does money from the government, which favors a tilt towards man caused climate change, have? If you know that the President is looking for research to prove that climate change exists, then how will you skew your research? Of course to get the answer the money is looking for. It cuts both ways, or neither.
You know, I just had a thought, maybe we could crowdsource a Margaret Sanger Museum, raise money from the supporters of PP, and those who know her history. It could have murals depicting the 10s of millions of babies whose lives were snuffed in her grand scheme. You could show newspaper clippings of her meeting with the Klan., You could put her wonderful quotes on the wall to show how wonderful she was, and how here legacy continues today. You just have to tell people that it is a true tribute to the woman who has done so much to so many. You could mount in front the busts of people that PP has awarded with their highest honor,
As a closing comment. The Center for Medical Progress videos have been accused of being edited and spliced together to get the desired result. It is true they have been edited for time constraint, but the full unedited versions are available on their website, AND have been verified by several non partisan groups, and media, that the edited versions were indeed ONLY edited for time, and not content.
Comments
Post a Comment