Thinking on the wild side.
Too long to post in a facebook post, in my opinion. Not a long one here, but wanted to get this out, just in case.
I mentioned previously that the polling perplexed me. That something seems wrong. No, I didn't, and won't break down those polls, and most will say at this point that other than 20% that has already voted, there is substantial agitation in the water. I would say that the pre-Comey announcement polls are out.
I loved Trey Gowdy's response to the dishonorable Senator from Nevada, Harry Reid's letter, accusing the man he just praised a few months ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvMcoZj9Su0
Being Mormon, I didn't mind the inference, because most know that it is not true.
Make no mistake that Hillary would not be in this position, if she had followed the rules that ALL federal employees are accountable for. She did this to herself.
I know, milquetoast. So check this out. Referring to the polling above.
What if, there was significant internal polling that indicated that Hillary was going to lose? Can you imagine the panic with the progressives? Everything that they have worked for, to be trashed by someone elected by the people the progressives state they want to help. (All lies, of course, they only want to enrich themselves) How do you deal with that? How do you explain that the little people have rejected your benevolence?
The FBI Director reopens the case against Hillary. He had a justification to do so. Of course, the campaign is blindsided. With no WIFI on the plane, they only find out when they land. They lash out, panicked like nobody's business.
And what does the President's propogandist say? We believe in the integrity of the FBI, of course they would never politicize this. We await a speedy determination of the new evidence. and on and on.
So, hypothetically, let's say Trump wins. The socialists blame the emails, (remember, it is not the ideology, it is the individual) and when everything collapses, they have a scapegoat.
Trump.
Do I believe it? That isn't the question. It is making you think, isn't it? Because it IS plausible. no matter how unlikely.
I mentioned previously that the polling perplexed me. That something seems wrong. No, I didn't, and won't break down those polls, and most will say at this point that other than 20% that has already voted, there is substantial agitation in the water. I would say that the pre-Comey announcement polls are out.
I loved Trey Gowdy's response to the dishonorable Senator from Nevada, Harry Reid's letter, accusing the man he just praised a few months ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvMcoZj9Su0
Being Mormon, I didn't mind the inference, because most know that it is not true.
Make no mistake that Hillary would not be in this position, if she had followed the rules that ALL federal employees are accountable for. She did this to herself.
I know, milquetoast. So check this out. Referring to the polling above.
What if, there was significant internal polling that indicated that Hillary was going to lose? Can you imagine the panic with the progressives? Everything that they have worked for, to be trashed by someone elected by the people the progressives state they want to help. (All lies, of course, they only want to enrich themselves) How do you deal with that? How do you explain that the little people have rejected your benevolence?
The FBI Director reopens the case against Hillary. He had a justification to do so. Of course, the campaign is blindsided. With no WIFI on the plane, they only find out when they land. They lash out, panicked like nobody's business.
And what does the President's propogandist say? We believe in the integrity of the FBI, of course they would never politicize this. We await a speedy determination of the new evidence. and on and on.
So, hypothetically, let's say Trump wins. The socialists blame the emails, (remember, it is not the ideology, it is the individual) and when everything collapses, they have a scapegoat.
Trump.
Do I believe it? That isn't the question. It is making you think, isn't it? Because it IS plausible. no matter how unlikely.
Comments
Post a Comment